RP2040 PIO: Script fails on some GPIO numbers
Port, board and/or hardware
RP Pico (RP2040)
MicroPython version
MicroPython v1.26.1 on 2025-09-11; Raspberry Pi Pico with RP2040
Reproduction
Link GPIO 1-17, attach a scope/LA to GPIO 2, and run the following:
from machine import Pin, PWM
import rp2
import time
inp = Pin(0, Pin.IN)
jmp = Pin(1, Pin.IN)
opp = Pin(2, Pin.OUT, value=1)
pwm = PWM(Pin(17)) # Link GPIO 17 to GPIO 1
pwm.freq(1000)
pwm.duty_u16(0xFFFF // 2)
@rp2.asm_pio(out_init=rp2.PIO.OUT_LOW)
def sm_test():
set(x, 0)
wrap_target()
wait(0, pins, 1) # Wait for GPIO 1 to go low
mov(osr, x) # Ouput==0 while input==0
out(pins, 1)
label("loop") # Loop until jump pin goes high
jmp(pin, "pulse")
jmp("loop")
label("pulse")
mov(osr, invert(x)) # Emit a pulse
out(pins, 1)
mov(osr, x)
out(pins, 1)
wrap()
sm0 = rp2.StateMachine(0, sm_test, freq=100_000, out_base=opp , in_base=inp, jmp_pin=jmp)
sm0.restart()
sm0.active(1)
while True:
time.sleep(1)
print("Running")
Expected behaviour
Expected to output a single pulse on GPIO 2 after every positive going edge of GPIO 17.
Observed behaviour
As written, works as designed.
If the link is changed to link GPIO 17 and 14, and the code changed to read
inp = Pin(13, Pin.IN)
jmp = Pin(14, Pin.IN)
pulses are emitted all the time the input is high. If GPIO 1 is strapped to 3V3, pulses stop. Note GPIO 1 is not referenced in the code.
If GPIO 1 and GPIO 14 are linked it runs as designed. This behaviour continues after a power cycle!
Additional Information
RP2350 behaves similarly except that the sensitivity to GPIO 1 is lacking.
The decorator arg is necessary for the code to work. If this is intended it should be documented as this seems unexpected.
Code of Conduct
Yes, I agree
rp2: on RP2350 configure jmp pins as input if they are in isolation mode
Summary
On RP2350, enable PIO jmp pins as input if they haven't already been configured. This allows them to work as input pins to the PIO. Otherwise the pin remains in isolation mode from reset and doesn't work as expected, in particular code that works on RP2040 does not work on RP2350.
Resolves issue #17047.
Testing
Tested with the code in #17047. Without the fix here the test fails (as described there). With the fix, it passes.
Trade-offs and Alternatives
The alternative would be to just document this. But I think a little bit of code to help things work "out of the box" makes it easier for users.