← index #15761Issue #9993
Related · high · value 2.146
QUERY · ISSUE

asyncio try/except/finally handling skipped if `asyncio.run()` catches KeyboardInterrupt - asyncio.start_server() keeps running

openby frans-fuerstopened 2024-09-02updated 2024-09-02
bug

Port, board and/or hardware

probably all, at least posix and esp32

MicroPython version

MicroPython v1.24.0-preview.276.g1897fe622 on 2024-09-02; linux [GCC 11.4.0] version
also tried with
v1.23.0-preview.57.ge111793d8 on 2024-08-30; linux [GCC 11.4.0] version

Reproduction

demo.py:

import asyncio

async def async_func():
    try:
        while True:
            print("step")
            await asyncio.sleep(1)
    except asyncio.CancelledError:
        print("async_foo:CancelledError")
    except KeyboardInterrupt:
        print("async_foo:KeyboardInterrupt")
    finally:
        print("async_foo:finally")

try:
    asyncio.run(async_func())
except KeyboardInterrupt:
    print("run:KeyboardInterrupt")
finally:
    print("run:finally")

Running the provided snippet on either micropython built for Linux or on an ESP32 via mpremote and aborting the script using CTRL-C terminates the program, but the finally block inside async_func() won't be called:

$ path/to/micropython demo.py
step
...
step
^Crun:KeyboardInterrupt
run:finally

Expected behaviour

CPython executing the same snippet gives

$ python demo.py 
step
step
^Casync_foo:CancelledError
async_foo:finally
run:finally

indicating that the finally block is being executed.

Observed behaviour

It looks like MicroPythons asyncio.run() catches KeyboardInterrupt and instantly kills the event loop, skipping all code that might handle exceptions or doing unconditional stuff in finally.
While this might be desired behavior on IoT devices in general, the task created with asyncio.start_server wont be terminated, resulting in OSError: [Errno 112] EADDRINUSE error, if you started an asynchronous Micropython web server, terminated it, and tried to restart it.
See https://stackoverflow.com/questions/78886486/in-micropython-how-can-i-guarantee-asynchronous-tasks-being-shut-down

Additional Information

StackOverflow: In Micropython, how can I guarantee asynchronous tasks being shut down?](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/78886486/in-micropython-how-can-i-guarantee-asynchronous-tasks-being-shut-down)

Code of Conduct

Yes, I agree

CANDIDATE · ISSUE

uasyncio: Behaviour differs from CPython.

openby peterhinchopened 2022-11-17updated 2022-11-20
bug

Consider this script:

try:
    import uasyncio as asyncio
except ImportError:
    import asyncio

evt = asyncio.Event()

async def foo():
    try:
        await evt.wait()
    finally:
        print('Finally')

async def main():
    t = asyncio.create_task(foo())
    await asyncio.sleep(1)
    t. cancel()
    # Can be fixed with .sleep(0) here
    print('canned')
    await asyncio.sleep(1)

asyncio.run(main())

On MP the outcome is:

MicroPython v1.19.1-617-g43dd3ea74 on 2022-11-08; linux [GCC 9.4.0] version
Use Ctrl-D to exit, Ctrl-E for paste mode
>>> import rats
canned
Finally
>>> 

On CPython:

$ python3
Python 3.8.10 (default, Jun 22 2022, 20:18:18) 
[GCC 9.4.0] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import rats
Finally
canned
>>> 

MP behaviour also confirmed on Pyboard.

Keyboard

j / / n
next pair
k / / p
previous pair
1 / / h
show query pane
2 / / l
show candidate pane
c
copy suggested comment
r
toggle reasoning
g i
go to index
?
show this help
esc
close overlays

press ? or esc to close

copied