← index #8794PR #17698
Related · high · value 0.424
QUERY · ISSUE

UART sendbreak bug

openby AeroSynthopened 2022-06-21updated 2022-06-28

There is a bug with the uart.sendbreak() method with V1.17 (haven't checked the latest)

The manual states the break signal lasts 13 bits. It actually is 11.
This has caused errors with external sensors that utilize the SDI-12 protocol. .The line needs to go for at least 12ms. Now, it is 9.167 ms. Even 13 bits is not long enough.
A good solution is to add a property where you can specify how many bits you can use.
SDI-12 is popular in agriculture and other industrial applications. (www.sdi-12.org)

CANDIDATE · PULL REQUEST

esp32/machine_uart: Change `sendbreak()` implementation to simply pull the pin low for the break period

mergedby dpgeorgeopened 2025-07-17updated 2025-07-23
port-esp32

Summary

Currently, UART.sendbreak() on esp32 will reconfigure the UART to a slower baudrate and send out a null byte, to synthesise a break condition. That's not great because it changes the baudrate of the RX path as well, which could miss incoming bytes while sending the break.

This PR changes the sendbreak implementation to just reconfigure the TX pin as GPIO in output mode, and hold the pin low for the required duration.

Testing

Existing test is updated (simplified) and works well on ESP32_GENERIC.

Also tested that RPI_PICO_W still passes this test.

Trade-offs and Alternatives

There's uart_write_bytes_with_break() but that requires at least 1 byte to be sent before the break, so we can't use that.

There's also the lower level uart_hal_tx_break() but I'm not sure how to use that properly in conjunction with the higher level driver.

Keyboard

j / / n
next pair
k / / p
previous pair
1 / / h
show query pane
2 / / l
show candidate pane
c
copy suggested comment
r
toggle reasoning
g i
go to index
?
show this help
esc
close overlays

press ? or esc to close

copied