<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Writing on alelec blog</title>
    <link>https://notes.alelec.net/tags/writing/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Writing on alelec blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 12:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://notes.alelec.net/tags/writing/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Teaching Claude to Write Like Me (Not Like Claude)</title>
      <link>https://notes.alelec.net/posts/teaching-claude-to-write-like-me/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://notes.alelec.net/posts/teaching-claude-to-write-like-me/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;ve been using Claude Code daily for months now. It writes most of my code, documentation, commit messages, PR descriptions. The code is great. The prose, not so much.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Not because it&amp;rsquo;s bad writing, it&amp;rsquo;s perfectly competent. The problem is it sounds like AI. Every PR description comes out with &amp;ldquo;This PR implements&amp;hellip;&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;Additionally&amp;hellip;&amp;rdquo; and perfect parallel structure across all bullet points. It&amp;rsquo;s polished in a way that I&amp;rsquo;m not, and that&amp;rsquo;s exactly what makes it obvious.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
